You have a wg0.conf and a client that only accepts .ovpn, so someone suggests converting the file. Renaming it produces a profile OpenVPN cannot parse, and a careful field-by-field translation produces one that parses and then fails at the handshake. The reason is not the file format. WireGuard and OpenVPN are different protocols with different handshakes, different authentication models and different ideas about what a peer is. Conversion works only in the sense that you can go and get an OpenVPN profile from whoever runs the far end.

The file you have describes a peer, not a connection profile

A WireGuard configuration is short because the protocol is: an interface with a private key and addresses, then one or more peers with a public key, an endpoint and an AllowedIPs list. There is no negotiation layer to configure and no cipher suite to choose.

An OpenVPN profile is a client for a TLS-based control channel, which is why it carries certificate or credential references and directives describing how to authenticate.

Why a translated file still fails the handshake

WireGuard begins with a Noise-based handshake keyed by static peer keys, and it stays silent unless the peer's public key is already known. OpenVPN opens a TLS session, verifies a server certificate or a static key, and then authenticates the user with certificates, a username and password, or both. Nothing in a WireGuard file describes any of that. A translated file would carry the right endpoint and the wrong everything else.

Reusing the address and port does not help either, because the far end is listening for a different packet.

What to ask the provider

If a provider supplied the WireGuard file, ask whether the same account has OpenVPN access and request that profile. Many do, and it arrives with its own credentials rather than as a modified copy of the first one.

If the answer is no, the constraint is the subscription rather than the file, and no converter changes it.

If the router or client only speaks OpenVPN

When the device that must connect supports only OpenVPN, check the far end's documented protocol support before hunting for another extension. A router that terminates OpenVPN cannot be persuaded to accept WireGuard by importing a file. The workable options are an OpenVPN endpoint on the server side, or a different device that speaks WireGuard.

Pick based on who administers the far end, not on which file you happen to have.

If you run the server, add the protocol

Supporting a second protocol means running a second service. On a Linux server that is an OpenVPN instance with its own CA, server certificate, client certificates and server plus push directives, along with a firewall rule for its port. The existing WireGuard peer entry describes none of those objects. Plan the address pool and the pushed routes separately from the WireGuard AllowedIPs, because they are not the same mechanism wearing two names.

Then verify from the client: the profile loads, the TLS session completes, the pushed route appears, and traffic reaches a host that is only reachable through the tunnel.

Where the converter idea is safe

Translating values by hand into notes is fine and often useful, because the endpoint, the addresses and the peer public key are just facts about the deployment. Uploading a private key to a website that promises conversion is not fine, since that key is the credential and the service has no protocol to convert it to. If you need the same access from an OpenVPN client, ask for an OpenVPN credential instead.

Keep the two configurations side by side and treat them as separate access paths, because that is what they are.

ບົດຄວາມທີ່ກ່ຽວຂ້ອງ